24 Marine Smart Surveyors
info@24marine.com
+507 63074419
info@24marine.com
+507 63074419
An inbound container vessel had just picked up the pilot. Two crew were on the upper deck preparing the port accommodation ladder prior to mustering at their mooring stations. Although they had brought two life vests on deck with them, these floatation devices stayed on the deck as they went about their work.
The hoist winch was tested by lowering the accommodation ladder approximately 1 metre and then slightly raising it. It was then lowered approximately 3 metres to allow a crew member to walk under the davit frame. A crew member stepped on to the upper platform and proceeded to the lower end where he rigged a section of collapsible handrails. He then went to the lower platform to make the rails secure while another crew member secured the safety ropes around the upper platform.
Suddenly, a loud bang was heard followed by a whirring sound as the ladder fell rapidly towards the sea. The lower ladder broke away and fell into the water, taking the attending crew member with it. The upper
section of the ladder was left hanging vertically down from its upper platform hinges with the hoist wire dangling from the davit.
A crew member alerted the bridge via VHF radio and then ran aft to look for the victim over the stern. A tug was close by, but there was no sign of the victim. The vessel was in the relatively confined waters of the port and making between 5 and 6 knots through the water. One of the attending tugs and the pilot boat were assigned to look for the victim, as the vessel was constrained by the restricted water. The victim was spotted about half a metre below the surface of the water and recovered by the pilot boat crew some 10 to 15 minutes after the event, but there were no signs of life.
The subsequent autopsy determined the cause of death to be ‘drowning with blunt force injuries’. The victim had suffered blunt force injuries to his head, neck, chest, back, abdomen and legs, resulting in a broken right femur, fractured ribs, multiple bruising and abrasions. These injuries were not considered to be fatal.
Lessons learned
Details on the attached file.
Lesson Learned:
This Incident was taken from Marine Accident Investigation Branch from UK.
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/maib-safety-digests
24marine.com marine & cargo surveyors panama smart survey
Interesting investigation from U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
The U.S. NTSB has determined that an insufficient preventative maintenance program and lack of guidance for responding to engine high-temperature conditions, led to the January 14, 2018, fire on board the small passenger vessel Island Lady, in the waters of the Pithlachascotee River, near Port Ritchey, Florida.
The NTSB’
s investigation determined:
• The raw-water pump’s failure resulted from Tropical Breeze Casino Cruz’s failure to follow Caterpillar’s recommended maintenance schedule.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAWF_UR-_jI
Major Loss in shipping.
Good reading and take note of the lessons learned.
Source: https://www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/Reports/AGCS_Safety_Shipping_Review_2018.pdf
In the marine industry there are two distinct types of average. General average (GA) and particular average (PA).
Under the Marine Insurance Act 1906 a general average loss and particular loss are defined as:
Here below the link for
Marine Insurance Act 1906
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41/contents
This unfortanate incident caused by two vessels no folowing communication protocols.
Real Life event
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=75&v=FmDybTIxrJc
Let me know Your comments below.
Which of the two vessel is responsible?